Language and Societies

ANT/LIN 5320 at Wayne State University

Creating Calm: Cold War Era Public Messaging from the Civil Defense Agency

Creating Calm: Cold War Era Public Messaging from the Civil Defense Agency

Brittney Eastin

The Civil Defense Agency was the government entity responsible for distributing information on protecting oneself in the event of a nuclear attack. Looking primarily at publications by the Detroit Civil Defense Agency, one can tell that there was an urgency to keep the population calm and limitedly informed. Other sources from released federal documents and internal correspondence also suggest that information was distributed cautiously. Efforts to create a sense of control, power, and security can be seen in conflicting information between internal correspondence, CDA, and DCDA publications. The messaging to the public involved false equivalences, comparing potential bombs to less severe nuclear disasters, survival rates rooted in flawed comparisons, and poor information on survival outside of the short-term effects. Information on nuclear bombs was still in development, but federal documents now released to the public show that some negative long-term effects were known at the time. Controlled dissemination of information was likely done to prevent panic among citizens and create a sensation of confidence in one’s government’s capacity of protection.

April 15, 2024 - Posted by | abstract

3 Comments »

  1. As someone who used to be obsessed with war-era advertising, I really love this topic. It is super interesting to see the type of language people used to keep order in society. As with many things, the more limited knowledge of the reality of a situation a public has, the less chances for revolution, or panic. It always makes me wonder what we really know about the things we feel so confident about, and how hard others are working to keep those perceptions alive. I would definitely like to read more about this!

    Comment by Jayme Brown | April 16, 2024 | Reply

  2. This is a very interesting topic. We definitely know that before the digital era, the public had access to only what the government wanted them to have and in the narrative it wanted them to be told. Things would have stayed the same if it was not for the digital advancements including smartphones and social media platforms. Thanks to mainstreaming, everyone is a journalist now and events can’t be shaped or altered and the public is entitled to know the truth.

    Comment by Niyaz Najm Salih | April 17, 2024 | Reply

  3. This analysis is really fascinating, especially considering the placing of false information for the sake of comfort or public calm. I wonder how this way of conveying information carried over to the sharing of news concerning what was happening in other countries and impacted areas. How was this information altered as well? I would be interested in reading your full paper, as well as looking over the documents and primary sources!

    Comment by Brianna LeBlanc | April 20, 2024 | Reply


Leave a comment