“Detroit is a Blank Slate”: Metaphors in the Journalistic Discourse of Art and Entrepreneurship in the City of Detroit
“Detroit is a Blank Slate”: Metaphors in the Journalistic Discourse of Art and Entrepreneurship in the City of Detroit
Siobhan Gregory
In the current discourse about Detroit’s renewal, metaphoric language often reflects tensions between ideas about the physical, economic, and the emotional “landscape” of the city: abandonment vs. investment, stagnation vs. movement, physical change vs. ideological change. This paper investigates metaphoric language in two Detroit discourse communities, artists and business entrepreneurs, to reveal ideas about race, class, identity, and sense of place. Local and national news sources and independent online publications from 2009 to 2011 are reviewed for themes reflecting metaphorical content. These sources include the Time. Inc, Detroit Blog, Time Magazine Online, CNN.com Assignment Detroit, The New York Times Online, Huffington Post Detroit, and the online publication Model D. The analysis is shaped utilizing Lakoff’s and Johnson’s three key frameworks for metaphorical concepts: orientational metaphors, ontological metaphors, and structural metaphors. A literature review of metaphors in gentrification discourse provides a background for this discussion. The metaphorical language of Detroit, particularly at this period in its history, serves both to confirm and challenge existing metaphors evident in gentrification discourse. Key metaphors are identified: DETROIT AS OUT-OF-PLACE, dissolving, vacant, and unbounded; DETROIT AS A SUICIDE VICTIM who, responsible for its own demise, can only to be brought back to life through the help of outsiders; DETROIT AS A SEXUALIZED FETISH, a prize to be both exploited and guarded, and which, in a state of submission and reckless abandonment, is aestheticized and glamorized. The local and national media attention to these discourse communities creates a prevailing narrative of the city that parallels the metaphorical construct of GENTRIFIER AS PIONEER, GUARDIAN, and SALVATIONIST.
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- April 2022 (20)
- April 2021 (14)
- April 2020 (22)
- April 2019 (15)
- April 2018 (15)
- April 2017 (25)
- April 2016 (22)
- April 2015 (30)
- April 2014 (19)
- April 2013 (23)
- April 2012 (15)
- April 2011 (19)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
I am drawn to the “invention” metaphor. Since inventions like mass-produced automobiles are what put Detroit on the map, “re-inventing Detroit” has positive resonance. Good luck, have fun!
I think that you did a great job on that composition or essay or whatever it is, Siobhan Gregory! It’s brilliant.
I understand that this work addresses journalistic discourse and that it may be/have been impractical to do actual fieldwork in Detroit. It may be that the paper itself acknowledges the constructed (at-a-distance, not-on-site) nature of the discourse(s) analyzed, though that does not seem to be made explicitly here. Even so, especially where questions of representation (how discourses talk about people) and race are concerned, I get nervous letting the “mouthpieces” be the only, prime, or even central concern of an analytical effort. (Reported speech in discursive texts is not necessarily a convincing window “to the street”.) Please understand, I’m not accusing this paper of not being what I’d rather it were or ignoring that it arose in an anthropology class where these issues have long been important topics. I am saying that what attentiveness to those problems of representation are explored in the paper could be more clearly stated in the abstract.